Sunlit office desk with books for risks, controls, evidence and action, anonymous records and a clear glass sphere.

Capability

Audit, risk & compliance

Connect risks, controls and operating evidence to management action, with a clear scope and defined professional responsibility for every review.

A reporting obligation, concern about a control, incident or dispute calls for a precise question and appropriate evidence access. Explore the relevant area below, or start a conversation about your context.

Audit and assurance

Define the review.
Clarify the responsibility.

Statutory, tax, internal, management and financial-control reviews address different needs. Start with the question, the relevant records and the intended use of the review. Any formal audit or assurance engagement must identify the appointed professional entity and the applicable independence requirements.

The agreed scope determines what is examined and what the review can establish. Responsibility for a formal opinion belongs to the appointed professional entity.

Five labelled glass review types beside readable scope and formal-opinion boundaries.
Statutory; Tax; Internal; Management; Financial-control. Scope defines what is examined and what the review can establish. Formal opinion belongs to the appointed professional entity.
  • Static statutory review-type object.

    Statutory

  • Static tax review-type object.

    Tax

  • Static internal review-type object.

    Internal

  • Static management review-type object.

    Management

  • Static financial-control review-type object.

    Financial-control

Audit, risk & compliance

Risk and internal controls

A control on paper is only part of the picture.

Map material business risks and examine both control design and operation. A documented control describes what should happen; operating evidence helps establish what actually happens, who is responsible and where further examination is needed.

Source information informs focused testing.

Material risk

Understand the business context and the risk.

risk object on a stone podium.

Expected control behaviour

Review the documented control and what should happen.

paper object on a stone podium.

Operating evidence

Consider evidence of what actually happens, who is responsible and where further examination is needed.

operating object on a stone podium.

Remaining exposure

Bring the information together to identify areas for further examination.

exposure object on a stone podium.

Management ownership

Management retains ownership of controls and corrective action.

ownership object on a stone podium.
Source information joins the review and points towards operating evidence.
Business context, control descriptions, evidence owners and previous findings inform operating evidence and focused testing.

Business context, control descriptions, evidence owners and previous findings help focus testing on remaining exposure. Management retains ownership of controls and corrective action.

Audit, risk & compliance

Forensic and investigation support

A concern is a starting point, not a finding.

A suspected fraud, incident or dispute requires a defined question, controlled evidence access and clear professional responsibility. Scope the evidence work around relevant records, access permissions and confidentiality constraints. Observed evidence and its evaluation must remain distinct from the allegation that prompted the review.

The review should establish what the available evidence supports, what remains uncertain and where further examination may be needed.

Records and the investigation question feed evidence evaluation, connected to supported evidence, uncertainty and possible further examination.
Documents; Data; Communications; Transactions; Other records → Evidence evaluation. The investigation question → Evidence evaluation. Possible evidence positions: Supported by evidence; Remains uncertain; Further examination may be needed. They are possibilities, not findings about a client.

From the evidence question

Considerations for the review.

A defined question, controlled evidence access and clear professional responsibility.

  • Illustrative question evidence subject connected to the next consideration.

    Defined question

    Clarify the concern and scope the evidence work around relevant records, access permissions and confidentiality constraints.

  • Illustrative access evidence subject connected to the next consideration.

    Controlled evidence access

    Review relevant records with controlled access and appropriate permissions.

  • Illustrative evaluation evidence subject connected to the next consideration.

    Evidence evaluation

    Keep observed evidence and its evaluation distinct from the allegation that prompted the review.

  • Illustrative position evidence subject connected to the next consideration.

    Available evidence

    Establish what the available evidence supports and what remains uncertain.

  • Illustrative next evidence subject connected to the next consideration.

    Further examination

    Identify where further examination may be needed.

Corporate and operating compliance

Connect obligations to operating evidence.

Corporate, labour, industrial, establishment and contractor obligations need to be understood in their operating context. Review how those obligations appear in records, accountable responsibilities and management action across the relevant entities and sites.

An obligation list alone does not establish compliance. Expected records, observed gaps and exceptions help identify what requires review and who is responsible for responding.

Obligation categories connect to entities, sites, records, gaps, responsibilities and action.
Corporate, labour, industrial, establishment and contractor obligations connect to entities and sites. Expected records, observed gaps and exceptions, accountable responsibilities and management action support informed review and response.

Keep evidence, judgement and action distinct.

A review becomes useful when its observations, interpretation and response are clear. These responsibilities connect, but they are not interchangeable.

Blue evidence records, amber evaluation magnifier and green management-action checklist and clock in distinct connected glass panels.
Evidence; Evaluation; Management action. Clear connectors show related but distinct responsibilities. Abstract document marks are illustrative.

Evidence

Process and financial records, control descriptions and operating evidence show what was observed and where gaps remain. Access and confidentiality constraints define what can be examined.

Layered anonymous records, kraft folders and blue glass.

Evaluation

Consider the evidence against the review question, material risks and agreed scope. Explain findings, limitations and matters requiring further examination.

Gold magnifier with stone and blue glass.

Management action

Connect the response to accountable owners, timing and follow-up evidence. Recurring review can make unresolved exceptions and corrective action visible to management and oversight forums.

Abstract checklist, green clock and plant.

Start with the question you need to resolve.

Share a brief description of the review, control concern or operating issue, along with any important timing. You do not need to choose a service before starting a conversation.

Start a conversation
Risk, controls and resilience books beside an amber glass disc, clear pane and pale stone forms in a sunlit office.